The Efficacy and Tolerability of Irbesartan/Amlodipine Combination Therapy in Patients With Essential Hypertension Whose Blood Pressure Were not Controlled by Irbesartan Monotherapy

Hae Young Lee, Kyung Wan Min, Kyung Ah Han, Jeong Su Kim, Jeong Cheon Ahn, Moo Hyun Kim, Jin Bae Lee, Sung Hee Shin, Chong Jin Kim, Kye Hun Kim, Deok Kyu Cho, Junghyun Choi, Moo Yong Rhee, Sung Ho Her, Weon Kim, Jin Oh Na, Goo Yeong Cho, Seok Yeon Kim, Gyung Min Park, Bong Ki LeeSang Ho Jo, Byung Wan Lee, Il Suk Sohn, Doo Il Kim, Sang Hyun Ihm, Sun Hwa Lee, Joong Wha Chung, Eun Joo Cho, Jang Won Son, Seung Jin Oh, Jin Yong Hwang, Jin Ok Jeong, Kyoo Rok Han, Hyuck Jun Yoon, Suk Min Seo, Wook Jin Chung, Jang Whan Bae, Jin Ho Choi, Bok Jin Hyun, Ji Eun Cha, Seung Ji Yoo, Jinho Shin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of irbesartan (IRB) and amlodipine (AML) combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension whose blood pressure (BP) was not controlled by IRB monotherapy. Methods: Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III studies were conducted in Korea (the I-DUO 301 study and the I-DUO 302 study). After a 4-week run-in period with either 150 mg IRB (I-DUO 301 study) or 300 mg IRB (I-DUO 302 study), patients with uncontrolled BP (ie, mean sitting systolic BP [MSSBP] ≥140 mmHg to <180 mmHg and mean sitting diastolic BP <110 mmHg) were randomized to the placebo, AML 5 mg, or AML 10 mg group. A total of 428 participants were enrolled in the 2 I-DUO studies. In the I-DUO 301 study, 271 participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either IRB/AML 150/5 mg, IRB/AML 150/10 mg, or IRB 150 mg/placebo. In the I-DUO 302 study, 157 participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive IRB/AML 300/5 mg or IRB 300 mg/placebo. The primary endpoint was the change in MSSBP from baseline to week 8. Tolerability was assessed according to the development of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and clinically significant changes in physical examination, laboratory tests, pulse, and 12-lead electrocardiography. Findings: In I-DUO 301, the mean (SD) changes of MSSBP at week 8 from baseline were −14.78 (12.35) mmHg, −21.47 (12.78) mmHg, and −8.61 (12.19) mmHg in the IRB/AML 150/5 mg, IRB/AML 150/10 mg, and IRB 150 mg/placebo groups, respectively. In I-DUO 302, the mean (SD) changes of MSSBP at week 8 from baseline were −13.30 (12.47) mmHg and −7.19 (15.37) mmHg in the IRB/AML 300/5 mg and IRB 300 mg/placebo groups, respectively. In both studies, all combination groups showed a significantly higher reduction in MSSBP than the IRB monotherapy groups (P < 0.001 for both). TEAEs occurred in 10.00%, 10.99%, and 12.22% of participants in the IRB/AML 150/5 mg, IRB/AML 150/10 mg, and IRB 150 mg/placebo groups, respectively, in I-DUO 301 and in 6.33% and 10.67% of participants in the IRB/AML 300/5 mg and IRB 300 mg/placebo groups, respectively, in I-DUO 302, with no significant between-group differences. Overall, there was one serious adverse event throughout I-DUO study. Implications: The combination of IRB and AML has superior antihypertensive effects compared with IRB alone over an 8-week treatment period, with placebo-like tolerability. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05476354 (I-DUO 301), NCT05475665 (I-DUO 302).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)481-489
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Therapeutics
Volume46
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2024
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors

Keywords

  • Cardiovascular diseases
  • Combination
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Essential hypertension
  • Irbesartan/amlodipine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Efficacy and Tolerability of Irbesartan/Amlodipine Combination Therapy in Patients With Essential Hypertension Whose Blood Pressure Were not Controlled by Irbesartan Monotherapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this