Prediction of extraprostatic extension on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in patients with anterior prostate cancer

Hyungwoo Ahn, Sung Il Hwang, Hak Jong Lee, Hyoung Sim Suh, Gheeyoung Choe, Seok Soo Byun, Sung Kyu Hong, Sangchul Lee, Joongyub Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To validate how established markers of extraprostatic extension (EPE) are applied to anterior prostate cancers (APCs), and to investigate other novel markers if available. Methods: Among 614 histopathologically confirmed APCs from 2011 to 2016, 221 lesions with PiRADS (verion 2) scores ≥ 4 on 3-T multi-parametric MRI were analyzed retrospectively. Two radiologists independently assessed capsular morphology qualitatively with 5-point scale (normal, thinning, bulging, loss, extracapsular disease), and capsule contact length (arc), tumor dimension, and their ratio (arc-dimension ratio) quantitatively. Reproducibility in measurement was assessed with κ and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). Logistic regression analysis was done to find meaningful indicators of EPE. Diagnostic performance of markers was compared to one another with generalized linear model and multi-reader multi-case ROC analysis. Results: Reproducibility was moderate to substantial (κ 0.45–0.73) for qualitative, and moderate to almost perfect (ICC 0.50–0.87) for quantitative features of EPE. Capsular morphology (odds ratio [OR] 1.818), capsule contact length (OR 1.115), tumor dimension (OR 1.035), and arc-dimension ratio (OR 1.846) were independently associated with EPE (p ≤ 0.019). Capsular bulging and capsule contact length of 10 mm as thresholds of EPE demonstrated sensitivity/specificity of 0.58/0.85 and 0.77/0.68, respectively. Capsule contact length yielded greatest AUC (0.784), followed by capsular morphology (0.778), arc-dimension ratio (0.749), and tumor dimension (0.741). Diagnostic performance of capsular morphology, capsule contact length, and arc-dimension ratio was comparable in predicting EPE. Conclusions: Existing markers of EPE applicable regardless of locations of tumors apply similarly to APCs. Arc-dimension ratio may be a novel marker of EPE of APCs. Key Points: • Existing imaging markers of extraprostatic extension (EPE) which have been applied regardless of locations of tumors are reflected similarly to anterior prostate cancers (APCs). • Measuring tumor dimension without capsular assessment may result in insufficient pre-operative prediction of EPE of APCs. • Arc-dimension ratio (capsule contact length divided by tumor dimension) exhibited highest OR and comparable performance to existing features in predicting EPE of APCs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)26-37
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Radiology
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2020

Keywords

  • Adenocarcinoma
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Neoplasm staging
  • Prostatic neoplasms

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prediction of extraprostatic extension on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in patients with anterior prostate cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this