TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and safety of daily home-based transcranial direct current stimulation as adjunct treatment for bipolar depressive episodes
T2 - Double-blind sham-controlled randomized clinical trial
AU - Lee, Jangwon
AU - Lee, Chan Woo
AU - Jang, Yoonjeong
AU - You, Ji Seon
AU - Park, Yun Seong
AU - Ji, Eunjeong
AU - Yu, Hyeona
AU - Oh, Sunghee
AU - Ryoo, Hyun A.
AU - Cho, Nayoung
AU - Park, Ji Yoon
AU - Yoon, Joohyun
AU - Baek, Ji Hyun
AU - Park, Hye Youn
AU - Ha, Tae Hyon
AU - Myung, Woojae
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Lee, Lee, Jang, You, Park, Ji, Yu, Oh, Ryoo, Cho, Park, Yoon, Baek, Park, Ha and Myung.
PY - 2022/9/20
Y1 - 2022/9/20
N2 - Background: Although transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is known to be a promising therapeutic modality for unipolar depression, the efficacy and safety of tDCS for bipolar depressive episodes (BD) are still unknown and clinical trials of home-based tDCS treatment are scarce. As a result, we set out to investigate the efficacy and safety of home-based tDCS for the treatment BD. Methods: Participants (n = 64), diagnosed as bipolar disorder as per the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5), were randomly assigned to receive tDCS. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) scores were measured at the baseline, week 2, 4, and 6, and home-based tDCS (for 30 min with 2 mA) was self-administered daily. Results: Of the 64 patients (15.6% bipolar disorder I, 84.4% bipolar disorder II), 41 patients completed the entire assessment. In the intention-to-treat analysis, time-group interaction for the HDRS-17 [F(3, 146.36) = 2.060; p = 0.108] and adverse effect differences between two groups were not statistically significant, except the pain score, which was higher in the active group than the sham group (week 0–2: p < 0.01, week 2–4: p < 0.05, and week 4–6: p < 0.01). Conclusion: Even though we found no evidence for the efficacy of home-based tDCS for patients with BD, this tool was found to be a safe and tolerable treatment modality for BD. Clinical trial registration: [https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03974815], identifier [NCT03974815].
AB - Background: Although transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is known to be a promising therapeutic modality for unipolar depression, the efficacy and safety of tDCS for bipolar depressive episodes (BD) are still unknown and clinical trials of home-based tDCS treatment are scarce. As a result, we set out to investigate the efficacy and safety of home-based tDCS for the treatment BD. Methods: Participants (n = 64), diagnosed as bipolar disorder as per the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5), were randomly assigned to receive tDCS. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) scores were measured at the baseline, week 2, 4, and 6, and home-based tDCS (for 30 min with 2 mA) was self-administered daily. Results: Of the 64 patients (15.6% bipolar disorder I, 84.4% bipolar disorder II), 41 patients completed the entire assessment. In the intention-to-treat analysis, time-group interaction for the HDRS-17 [F(3, 146.36) = 2.060; p = 0.108] and adverse effect differences between two groups were not statistically significant, except the pain score, which was higher in the active group than the sham group (week 0–2: p < 0.01, week 2–4: p < 0.05, and week 4–6: p < 0.01). Conclusion: Even though we found no evidence for the efficacy of home-based tDCS for patients with BD, this tool was found to be a safe and tolerable treatment modality for BD. Clinical trial registration: [https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03974815], identifier [NCT03974815].
KW - bipolar depressive episodes
KW - clinical trial
KW - double-blind
KW - efficacy
KW - safety
KW - transcranial direct current stimulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139265629&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.969199
DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.969199
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85139265629
VL - 13
JO - Frontiers in Psychiatry
JF - Frontiers in Psychiatry
SN - 1664-0640
M1 - 969199
ER -