Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection: prevalence, aetiology, evaluation, recommendations, and treatment

Irene Kalbian, Jung Wee Park, Karan Goswami, Young Kyun Lee, Javad Parvizi, Kyung Hoi Koo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Purpose: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a catastrophic complication after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Treatment of PJI is challenging, especially when causative microorganism is not identified. The purpose of this systematic review was to guide diagnostic approach and treatment of culture-negative (CN) PJI. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken on clinical studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases. Basic science studies, letters, studies written in languages other than English, case reports, and review articles were excluded. Results: Proportion of CN PJI ranged from 5 to 42% of PJIs. Risk factors for culture negativity included prior use of antibiotic before culture test, inappropriate culture tools, insufficient culture period, and post-operative wound drainage. Specific diagnostic protocols including repeating sampling, longer incubation period, culture in blood culture bottles, sonication of implants, polymerase chain reaction in synovial fluid, and next-generation sequencing are recommended to identify undetected microorganisms. Vancomycin and cephalosporins are the most commonly used antibiotics. Two-stage revision arthroplasty showed success rate of 70–100%. Conclusions: A comprehensive review was performed to provide an up-to-date, evidence-based guide to the management of CN PJI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1255-1261
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Orthopaedics
Volume44
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2020

Keywords

  • Arthroplasty
  • Culture
  • Infection
  • Systematic review

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection: prevalence, aetiology, evaluation, recommendations, and treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this