Comparison of clinical outcomes after ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome with or without arthroscopic debridement

Young Hak Roh, Jun Hoe Song, Hyun Sik Gong, Goo Hyun Baek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Forty-four patients who had been diagnosed with ulnar impaction syndrome and who were scheduled to undergo ulnar shortening osteotomy were randomized into two groups, one treated by ulnar shortening osteotomy alone and the other treated by ulnar shortening osteotomy combined with arthroscopic debridement. The response to treatment, including the pain numeric rating scale in an ulnar provocation test and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was assessed at 3 and 12 months after surgery. The mean pain and disability scores showed significant clinical improvement at the 12-month follow-up in both groups. The pain scores at 3 months of follow-up were significantly better in the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement group. However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in the disability scores at 3 and 12 months, or in the pain scores at 12-month follow-up. We conclude that similar improvements in symptom severity and hand function occurred in the long term in patients both with and without concomitant arthroscopic debridement. This information regarding concomitant arthroscopy could be used in the informed consent discussion with patients scheduled for ulnar shortening osteotomy. Level of evidence: II.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)589-593
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Hand Surgery: European Volume
Volume44
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Debridement
Osteotomy
Pain
Hand
Arthroscopy
Informed Consent
Arm

Keywords

  • Ulnar impaction syndrome
  • arthroscopic debridement
  • outcomes
  • triangular fibrocartilage complex
  • ulnar shortening osteotomy

Cite this

@article{c8b8fc03d40544e883b1b32458c8ea6c,
title = "Comparison of clinical outcomes after ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome with or without arthroscopic debridement",
abstract = "Forty-four patients who had been diagnosed with ulnar impaction syndrome and who were scheduled to undergo ulnar shortening osteotomy were randomized into two groups, one treated by ulnar shortening osteotomy alone and the other treated by ulnar shortening osteotomy combined with arthroscopic debridement. The response to treatment, including the pain numeric rating scale in an ulnar provocation test and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was assessed at 3 and 12 months after surgery. The mean pain and disability scores showed significant clinical improvement at the 12-month follow-up in both groups. The pain scores at 3 months of follow-up were significantly better in the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement group. However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in the disability scores at 3 and 12 months, or in the pain scores at 12-month follow-up. We conclude that similar improvements in symptom severity and hand function occurred in the long term in patients both with and without concomitant arthroscopic debridement. This information regarding concomitant arthroscopy could be used in the informed consent discussion with patients scheduled for ulnar shortening osteotomy. Level of evidence: II.",
keywords = "Ulnar impaction syndrome, arthroscopic debridement, outcomes, triangular fibrocartilage complex, ulnar shortening osteotomy",
author = "Roh, {Young Hak} and Song, {Jun Hoe} and Gong, {Hyun Sik} and Baek, {Goo Hyun}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1753193418808160",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "589--593",
journal = "Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume",
issn = "1753-1934",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Comparison of clinical outcomes after ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome with or without arthroscopic debridement. / Roh, Young Hak; Song, Jun Hoe; Gong, Hyun Sik; Baek, Goo Hyun.

In: Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume, Vol. 44, No. 6, 01.07.2019, p. 589-593.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of clinical outcomes after ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome with or without arthroscopic debridement

AU - Roh, Young Hak

AU - Song, Jun Hoe

AU - Gong, Hyun Sik

AU - Baek, Goo Hyun

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Forty-four patients who had been diagnosed with ulnar impaction syndrome and who were scheduled to undergo ulnar shortening osteotomy were randomized into two groups, one treated by ulnar shortening osteotomy alone and the other treated by ulnar shortening osteotomy combined with arthroscopic debridement. The response to treatment, including the pain numeric rating scale in an ulnar provocation test and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was assessed at 3 and 12 months after surgery. The mean pain and disability scores showed significant clinical improvement at the 12-month follow-up in both groups. The pain scores at 3 months of follow-up were significantly better in the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement group. However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in the disability scores at 3 and 12 months, or in the pain scores at 12-month follow-up. We conclude that similar improvements in symptom severity and hand function occurred in the long term in patients both with and without concomitant arthroscopic debridement. This information regarding concomitant arthroscopy could be used in the informed consent discussion with patients scheduled for ulnar shortening osteotomy. Level of evidence: II.

AB - Forty-four patients who had been diagnosed with ulnar impaction syndrome and who were scheduled to undergo ulnar shortening osteotomy were randomized into two groups, one treated by ulnar shortening osteotomy alone and the other treated by ulnar shortening osteotomy combined with arthroscopic debridement. The response to treatment, including the pain numeric rating scale in an ulnar provocation test and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was assessed at 3 and 12 months after surgery. The mean pain and disability scores showed significant clinical improvement at the 12-month follow-up in both groups. The pain scores at 3 months of follow-up were significantly better in the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement group. However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in the disability scores at 3 and 12 months, or in the pain scores at 12-month follow-up. We conclude that similar improvements in symptom severity and hand function occurred in the long term in patients both with and without concomitant arthroscopic debridement. This information regarding concomitant arthroscopy could be used in the informed consent discussion with patients scheduled for ulnar shortening osteotomy. Level of evidence: II.

KW - Ulnar impaction syndrome

KW - arthroscopic debridement

KW - outcomes

KW - triangular fibrocartilage complex

KW - ulnar shortening osteotomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060350398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1753193418808160

DO - 10.1177/1753193418808160

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 589

EP - 593

JO - Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume

JF - Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume

SN - 1753-1934

IS - 6

ER -