Automated identification of thrombectomy amenable vessel occlusion on computed tomography angiography using deep learning

Introduction: We developed and externally validated a fully automated algorithm using deep learning to detect large vessel occlusion (LVO) in computed tomography angiography (CTA). Method: A total of 2,045 patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent CTA were included in the development of our model. We validated the algorithm using two separate external datasets: one with 64 patients (external 1) and another with 313 patients (external 2), with ischemic stroke. In the context of current clinical practice, thrombectomy amenable vessel occlusion (TAVO) was defined as an occlusion in the intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA), or in the M1 or M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). We employed the U-Net for vessel segmentation on the maximum intensity projection images, followed by the application of the EfficientNetV2 to predict TAVO. The algorithm’s diagnostic performance was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: The mean age in the training and validation dataset was 68.7 ± 12.6; 56.3% of participants were men, and 18.0% had TAVO. The algorithm achieved AUC of 0.950 (95% CI, 0.915–0.971) in the internal test. For the external datasets 1 and 2, the AUCs were 0.970 (0.897–0.997) and 0.971 (0.924–0.990), respectively. With a fixed sensitivity of 0.900, the specificities and PPVs for the internal test, external test 1, and external test 2 were 0.891, 0.796, and 0.930, and 0.665, 0.583, and 0.667, respectively. The algorithm demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of approximately 0.95 in both internal and external datasets, specifically for cases involving intracranial ICA or M1-MCA occlusion. However, the diagnostic performance was somewhat reduced for isolated M2-MCA occlusion; the AUC for the internal and combined external datasets were 0.903 (0.812–0.944) and 0.916 (0.816–0.963), respectively. Conclusion: We developed and externally validated a fully automated algorithm that identifies TAVO. Further research is needed to evaluate its effectiveness in real-world clinical settings. This validated algorithm has the potential to assist early-career physicians, thereby streamlining the treatment process for patients who can benefit from endovascular treatment.