TY - JOUR
T1 - Abbreviated Screening MRI for Women with a History of Breast Cancer
T2 - Comparison with Full-Protocol Breast MRI
AU - Kim, Soo Yeon
AU - Cho, Nariya
AU - Hong, Hyunsook
AU - Lee, Youkyoung
AU - Yoen, Heera
AU - Kim, Yeon Soo
AU - Park, Ah Reum
AU - Ha, Su Min
AU - Lee, Su Hyun
AU - Chang, Jung Min
AU - Moon, Woo Kyung
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© RSNA, 2022.
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Background: Few studies have compared abbreviated breast MRI with full-protocol MRI in women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC), and they have not adjusted for confounding variables. Purpose: To compare abbreviated breast MRI with full-protocol MRI in women with PHBC by using propensity score matching to adjust for confounding variables. Materials and Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, women with PHBC who underwent full-protocol MRI (January 2008–August 2017) or abbreviated MRI (September 2017–April 2019) were identified. With use of a propensity score–matched cohort, screening performances were compared between the two MRI groups with the McNemar test or a propensity score–adjusted generalized estimating equation. The coprimary analyses were sensitivity and specificity. The secondary analyses were the cancer detection rate, interval cancer rate, positive predictive value for biopsies performed (PPV3), and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3 short-term follow-up rate. Results: There were 726 women allocated to each MRI group (mean age 6 SD, 50 years 6 8 for both groups). Abbreviated MRI and full-protocol MRI showed comparable sensitivity (15 of 15 cancers [100%; 95% CI: 78, 100] vs nine of 13 cancers [69%; 95% CI: 39, 91], respectively; P = .17). Abbreviated MRI showed higher specificity than full-protocol MRI (660 of 711 examinations [93%; 95% CI: 91, 95] vs 612 of 713 examinations [86%; 95% CI: 83, 88], respectively; P , .001). The cancer detection rate (21 vs 12 per 1000 examinations), interval cancer rate (0 vs five per 1000 examinations), and PPV3 (61% [14 of 23 examinations] vs 41% [nine of 22 examinations]) were comparable (all P , .05). The BI-RADS category 3 short-term follow-up rate of abbreviated MRI was less than half that of full-protocol MRI (5% [36 of 726 examinations] vs 12% [84 of 726 examinations], respectively; P , .001). Ninety-three percent (14 of 15) of cancers detected at abbreviated MRI were node-negative T1-invasive cancers (n = 6) or ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 8). Conclusion: Abbreviated breast MRI showed comparable sensitivity and superior specificity to full-protocol MRI in breast cancer detection in women with a personal history of breast cancer.
AB - Background: Few studies have compared abbreviated breast MRI with full-protocol MRI in women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC), and they have not adjusted for confounding variables. Purpose: To compare abbreviated breast MRI with full-protocol MRI in women with PHBC by using propensity score matching to adjust for confounding variables. Materials and Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, women with PHBC who underwent full-protocol MRI (January 2008–August 2017) or abbreviated MRI (September 2017–April 2019) were identified. With use of a propensity score–matched cohort, screening performances were compared between the two MRI groups with the McNemar test or a propensity score–adjusted generalized estimating equation. The coprimary analyses were sensitivity and specificity. The secondary analyses were the cancer detection rate, interval cancer rate, positive predictive value for biopsies performed (PPV3), and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3 short-term follow-up rate. Results: There were 726 women allocated to each MRI group (mean age 6 SD, 50 years 6 8 for both groups). Abbreviated MRI and full-protocol MRI showed comparable sensitivity (15 of 15 cancers [100%; 95% CI: 78, 100] vs nine of 13 cancers [69%; 95% CI: 39, 91], respectively; P = .17). Abbreviated MRI showed higher specificity than full-protocol MRI (660 of 711 examinations [93%; 95% CI: 91, 95] vs 612 of 713 examinations [86%; 95% CI: 83, 88], respectively; P , .001). The cancer detection rate (21 vs 12 per 1000 examinations), interval cancer rate (0 vs five per 1000 examinations), and PPV3 (61% [14 of 23 examinations] vs 41% [nine of 22 examinations]) were comparable (all P , .05). The BI-RADS category 3 short-term follow-up rate of abbreviated MRI was less than half that of full-protocol MRI (5% [36 of 726 examinations] vs 12% [84 of 726 examinations], respectively; P , .001). Ninety-three percent (14 of 15) of cancers detected at abbreviated MRI were node-negative T1-invasive cancers (n = 6) or ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 8). Conclusion: Abbreviated breast MRI showed comparable sensitivity and superior specificity to full-protocol MRI in breast cancer detection in women with a personal history of breast cancer.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138466172&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/radiol.213310
DO - 10.1148/radiol.213310
M3 - Article
C2 - 35699580
AN - SCOPUS:85138466172
VL - 305
SP - 36
EP - 45
JO - Radiology
JF - Radiology
SN - 0033-8419
IS - 1
ER -